🔎 Last reviewed: October 2026 · The PipAtlas Team
Prefer a preset? Jump to your pair:
📅 Updated: October 2026✍️ By The PipAtlas Team⏱ 3 min read
🎯 Position Size Calculator
Account currency: USD (≈ convert for others)
Beginners: 0.5–1%. Pros rarely exceed 2%.
Distance from entry to your stop loss.
Quick presets:
JPY & cross values are approximate (USD account). Gold pip = $0.10 price move.
0.04
Position size (lots)
4,000
Units
$10.00
Max loss at stop
—
If stop slips +10 pips
💡 Some brokers allow micro lots (0.01) — essential for small accounts. See which brokers suit your size →

How this calculator works — Position Size Calculator

Position sizing answers the only question that matters before you click buy or sell: “how big should this trade be so that if my stop is hit, I lose exactly what I planned — and no more?” It converts your risk budget into lots using four numbers: your balance, the percentage you're willing to lose, the distance to your stop, and what one pip is worth for the symbol you're trading.

Lots = (Balance × Risk %) ÷ (Stop loss in pips × Pip value per lot)

Example: ($1,000 × 1%) ÷ (25 pips × $10) = $10 ÷ $250 = 0.04 lots

Worked example — EURUSD, small account

You have a $1,000 account and risk 1% ($10). Your setup: buy EURUSD at 1.0850 with a stop at 1.0825 — that's 25 pips. On a standard lot, 1 pip of EURUSD is worth $10, so 25 pips would cost $250 per lot. $10 ÷ $250 = 0.04 lots. If the stop is hit you lose $10; if your target at 60 pips is hit you make $24 — a 1 : 2.4 risk/reward without ever risking more than your plan.

⚠️ Does leverage change this? No — a common misconception. Leverage changes how much margin the broker sets aside for the trade, not what your stop will cost you. Size from risk first; check margin second (use our Margin Calculator).

Pip value cheat sheet (USD accounts, 1.00 lot)

Symbol1 pip =Pip value / lotMicro lot (0.01)
EURUSD, GBPUSD, AUDUSD, NZDUSD0.0001$10.00$0.10
USDJPY0.01≈ $6.70≈ $0.07
USDCAD0.0001≈ $7.30≈ $0.07
XAUUSD (gold)$0.10 move$10.00$0.10

The 1% rule — and when to use less

Risking 1% means 10 losses in a row cost you ~10% of the account — painful but survivable, and 10-loss streaks happen to good traders. At 5% risk, the same streak cuts your account nearly in half while the win-rate needed to recover balloons. Under $500? Consider 0.5% risk, or a cent account where 0.01 lots behaves like 0.0001 standard lots.

CFDs and Forex are complex instruments with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Ensure you understand how these products work before trading. See our risk disclaimer.

Frequently asked questions — Position Size Calculator

How do I calculate position size in forex?

Use the formula above: balance × risk % ÷ (stop in pips × pip value per lot). This calculator automates it for majors, JPY pairs and gold, including micro-lot rounding.

What if my result is below the broker's 0.01 minimum?

Then a standard account can't express your risk plan — either widen the stop, reduce the symbol's volatility exposure (smaller timeframes), or use a cent account. Never round up to the minimum and hope; that silently doubles your risk.

Should I round lots up or down?

Always down (this calculator rounds down to 0.01). Rounding up means risking more than your planned percentage.

Is position size different for gold or indices?

The formula is identical — only the pip value changes. For gold we use the common convention of $10 per $0.10 move per standard lot (100 oz). Always confirm your broker's contract specifications.

Related tools & guides — Position Size Calculator

📏 Pip Value Calculator🏦 Margin Calculator⚖️ Risk/Reward Calculator🖨️ Printable Cheat Sheet📐 Pip Value Table📘 The 1% Rule Explained🥇 Trading Gold (XAUUSD)

Related — Position Size Calculator

🥇 XAUUSD version💶 EURUSD version⚡ GBPJPY version🧩 Any pair

💬 Questions about sizing? Discuss in the Forums →

PA
The PipAtlas Team

Retail trading educator team; years of FX & metals hands-on; builds the tools he wished he had as a beginner. Every calculator is verified against broker contract specs. Editorial policy →